Local democracy

Agenda item

CHAIR'S HIGHLIGHT REPORT - UPDATES ON LOGIC MODELS, INTEGRATION AND CHANGE BOARD AND THE EXECUTIVE COMMISSIONING BOARD

Previous Reference: Minute 4 (2019/20)

 

The Chair’s Highlight report (Document “H”) includes an update on:

 

·         data in the logic models which measures the Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy. It provides information on three measures which have been updated (suicide rate, smoking rate and IAPT (improving access to psychological therapies) recovery rate).

·         Executive Commissioning Board and the Integration and Change Board covering the September and October meetings.

 

Recommended-

 

(1) That the Executive Commissioning Board and the Integration and Change Board updates be noted.

 

(2) That the Board further discuss the progress made against the logic models and consider the allocations of any actions as necessary. 

 

                                                            (Sadia Hussain – 01274 435872)

 

Minutes:

Previous Reference: Minute 4 (2019/20)

 

The Chair’s Highlight report (Document “H”) included an update on:

 

·           data in the logic models which measured the Joint Health and    Wellbeing Strategy. It provided information on three measures which had been updated (suicide rate, smoking rate and IAPT (improving access to psychological therapies) recovery rate).

·           Executive Commissioning Board and the Integration and Change  Board covering the September and October meetings.

 

The update from the Integration and Change Board was highlighted at paragraph 3 of the report.

 

A summary of the current progress made around logic models was highlighted:

 

·         There were 41 indicators monitored as part of the Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy. Since the last update in July, new data on three of these indicators had been published.

 

·         Smoking prevalence had further fallen from 18.9% in 2017 to 18.5% in 2018. Smoking prevalence, however, remained higher than the national average, and higher than the statistical neighbours.

 

·         The suicide rate in Bradford District continued to fall, with 8.8 suicides per 100,000 population.  This was lower than the national average, and was lower than many of our statistical neighbours; our efforts continued to further reduce the number of suicides in the District; actions were set out in the  Suicide Prevention Action Plan (see July 2019 Logic Model  update to the Board for further detail); suicide data was continuing to be monitored every quarter from West Yorkshire Police, which showed that men were 4 times as likely to die by suicide, and that recent unemployment was a key risk factor.

 

·         Latest available data for IAPT recovery rates showed a mixed picture. There were signs of improvement in Airedale, Wharfedale and Craven, and Districts CCGs, however, the same level of improvement had not been seen in City. This was recognised, and new approaches were being considered as part of the Reducing Inequalities in City Programme.

 

Members made the following comments:

 

·         What were the outputs from the logic models?

·         Needed to look at exception reporting for indicators that were not being achieved.

·         Information at ward/local community partnership level would be useful so efforts could be concentrated in areas of greatest need.

·         Useful to have further information on progress with the actions that were included in the logic models as well as the outcomes that was hoped would be achieved; needed to understand where there was a wide variation.

·         Would be useful to have an update from Community Partnerships to update the Board at a locality level.

 

In response to the comments raised it was reported that an overview of all the indicators could be brought to the next Board meeting and Public Health was actively involved in Community Partnerships.

 

Resolved-

 

(1)  That the Executive Commissioning Board and the Integration and Change Board updates be noted.

 

(2)  That a development session be arranged to consider:

 

·         further information in relation to the logic models to include a focus on the actions and their outputs, in addition to the long term outcomes for people. Where possible to highlight differences in data at locality level as well as for the whole District.

·         update from Community Partnerships at a locality level

 

Action:  Health and Wellbeing Partnership Manager

 

 

 

 

Supporting documents: