Venue: Council Chamber - City Hall, Bradford. View directions
Contact: Su Booth
DISCLOSURES OF INTEREST
(Members Code of Conduct - Part 4A of the Constitution)
To receive disclosures of interests from Members and co-opted members on matters to be considered at the meeting. The disclosure must include the nature of the interest.
An interest must also be disclosed in the meeting when it becomes apparent to the Member during the meeting.
(1) Members may remain in the meeting and take part fully in discussion and voting unless the interest is a disclosable pecuniary interest or an interest which the Member feels would call into question their compliance with the wider principles set out in the Code of Conduct. Disclosable pecuniary interests relate to the Member concerned or their spouse/partner.
(2) Members in arrears of Council Tax by more than two months must not vote in decisions on, or which might affect, budget calculations, and must disclose at the meeting that this restriction applies to them. A failure to comply with these requirements is a criminal offence under section 106 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992.
(3) Members are also welcome to disclose interests which are not disclosable pecuniary interests but which they consider should be made in the interest of clarity.
(4) Officers must disclose interests in accordance with Council Standing Order 44.
In the interest of transparency, Councillor Stubb, declared an interest in respect of item P relating to 17 Fulford Walk, Bradford in that he made representation when that application was put before the Panel, however, he was not a member of the Panel at the time.
In the interest of transparency, Councillors Amran declared an interest in that he recognised some members of the public at the meeting, however he stated that they would consider the applications with an open mind.
In the interest of transparency, Councillors Cunningham, declared an interest in respect of item B relating to Prince of Wales Inn, 91 Harrogate Road Bradford in that he had been approached by members of public who had interest in this application. However, he stated that he had not discuss that application with anyone and would consider this application with an open mind.
That the minutes of the meeting held on 27 October 2021 be signed as a correct record.
(Su Booth – 07814 073884)
That the minutes of the meeting held on 27th October 2021, be signed as a correct record.
INSPECTION OF REPORTS AND BACKGROUND PAPERS
(Access to Information Procedure Rules – Part 3B of the Constitution)
Reports and background papers for agenda items may be inspected by contacting the person shown after each agenda item. Certain reports and background papers may be restricted.
Any request to remove the restriction on a report or background paper should be made to the relevant Strategic or Assistant Director whose name is shown on the front page of the report.
If that request is refused, there is a right of appeal to this meeting.
Please contact the officer shown below in advance of the meeting if you wish to appeal.
(Su Booth 07814 073884)
There were no appeals submitted by the public to review decisions to restrict
The Panel is asked to consider the planning applications which are set out in Document “G” relating to items recommended for approval or refusal.
The sites concerned are:
(Mohammed Yousuf – 01274 434605)
The Chair advised that the order of the agenda would be considered as follows: items, G, H, C, A, B, D, E and F. For the purpose of the minutes, items were minuted in the order they appeared in the published agenda.
(a) 20 Brackendale Parade Bradford BD10 0SR - 21/03248/FUL
Proposal: A full planning application for the construction of a new three-bedroom dwelling within the curtilage of 20 Brackendale Parade, Bradford, BD10 0SR.
The Strategic Director, Place, provided a detailed overview of the planning application, showing plans and photographs of the proposal. The Panel was informed that the proposal was not deemed to be harmful to the neighbouring properties.
An objector had registered to speak in relation to the proposed scheme, and at the request of the Chair, had raised a number of points, including:
· health and safety concerns as the development was in close proximity to electricity sub-station
· concerns to highways safety;
· concerns to work undertaken in the garden as this was too small for this development;
· the proposed development raised ecological concerns;
· all properties in the area had a covenants in place. The proposed scheme would be detrimental to the development and adjacent properties;
· increase car parking to the narrow street.
In response to the objector’s concerns, the Senior Planning Officer advised the Panel covenants on a property was not a planning matter, the person seeking to enforce covenant would be the legal owner of the property. In terms of parking, the proposal provided parking spaces for two vehicles, in addition to off street parking available.
In response to a Member’s question, the Senior Planning Officer informed the Panel that similar proposal had been granted planning permission and this proposal would be in line with other developments in the area.
The applicant/agent had registered to speak, and at the request of the Chair, informed the Committee that that proposed scheme adhered to all the relevant planning policies and plans. The proposal had been reduced and the design and layout was in character to the area.
The Chair moved to the vote on the officer’s recommendation and it was
That the application number 21/03248/FUL be approved for the reasons and subject to the conditions set out in the Strategic Director, Place’s technical report (Document “G”).
Action: Strategic Director, Place
(b) Prince Of Wales Inn 91 Harrogate Road Bradford
BD2 3ES - 21/02982/FUL
Proposal: A full planning application for the construction of a new roadside service station with canopy and ancillary parking at 91 Harrogate Road, Bradford, BD2 3ES.
The Strategic Director, Place, provided a detailed overview of the planning application, showing plans and photographs of the proposal.
Members noted the objector’s concerns with regards to the development would increase traffic to existing high traffic volume on a busy road. The proposed development would have a direct impact in terms of noise, air and light pollution of several homes, as well as have negative impacts on the visual amenity of the area.
Councillor Geoff Reid had registered to ... view the full minutes text for item 54.
The Panel is asked to consider other matters which are set out in Document “H” relating to miscellaneous items:
(Mohammed Yousuf – 01274 434605)
That the decisions made by the Secretary of State as set out in (Document “H”) be noted.
Action: Strategic Director, Place