Venue: Council Chamber - Keighley Town Hall. View directions
Contact: Claire Tomenson
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
DISCLOSURES OF INTEREST (Members Code of Conduct - Part 4A of the Constitution)
To receive disclosures of interests from Members and co-opted members on matters to be considered at the meeting. The disclosure must include the nature of the interest.
An interest must also be disclosed in the meeting when it becomes apparent to the Member during the meeting.
Notes:
(1) Members may remain in the meeting and take part fully in discussion and voting unless the interest is a disclosable pecuniary interest or an interest which the Member feels would call into question their compliance with the wider principles set out in the Code of Conduct. Disclosable pecuniary interests relate to the Member concerned or their spouse/partner.
(2) Members in arrears of Council Tax by more than two months must not vote in decisions on, or which might affect, budget calculations, and must disclose at the meeting that this restriction applies to them. A failure to comply with these requirements is a criminal offence under section 106 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992.
(3) Members are also welcome to disclose interests which are not disclosable pecuniary interests but which they consider should be made in the interest of clarity.
(4) Officers must disclose interests in accordance with Council Standing Order 44. Minutes: The following disclosures of interest were received in the interest of clarity:
Councillor Abid Hussain was a Ward Councillor for Keighley Central but had not discussed the planning application on the agenda.
Councillor Miller had not discussed any of the planning applications on the agenda.
Action: City Solicitor |
|
|
INSPECTION OF REPORTS AND BACKGROUND PAPERS (Access to Information Procedure Rules – Part 3B of the Constitution)
Reports and background papers for agenda items may be inspected by contacting the person shown after each agenda item. Certain reports and background papers may be restricted.
Any request to remove the restriction on a report or background paper should be made to the relevant Strategic or Assistant Director whose name is shown on the front page of the report.
If that request is refused, there is a right of appeal to this meeting.
Please contact the officer shown below in advance of the meeting if you wish to appeal.
(Claire Tomenson - 01274 432457) Minutes: There were no appeals submitted by the public to review decisions to restrict documents.
|
|
|
PUBLIC QUESTION TIME (Access to Information Procedure Rules – Part 3B of the Constitution)
To hear questions from electors within the District on any matter which is the responsibility of the Panel.
Questions must be received in writing by the City Solicitor in Room 112, City Hall, Bradford, by mid-day on Monday 11 July 2016.
(Claire Tomenson - 01274 432457)
Minutes: There were no questions submitted by the public.
|
|
|
APPLICATIONS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL OR REFUSAL The Panel is asked to consider the planning applications which are set out in Document “C” relating to items recommended for approval or refusal:
The sites concerned are:
(a) 2 Tower Road, Saltaire, Shipley (Approve) Shipley (b) 28 Lindisfarne Road, Shipley (Approve) Shipley (c) 50 Falcon Road, Bingley (Approve) Bingley (d) 6 Wheatley Rise, Ilkley (Approve) Ilkley (e) 9-11 Rocklands Avenue, Baildon (Approve) Baildon (f) Oxenhope Station, Station Road, Oxenhope, Worth Valley Keighley (Approve) (g) Rivendell, 49 Cemetery Lane, Keighley Keighley Central (Approve)
(Mohammed Yousuf – 01274 434605) Minutes: The Strategic Director, Regeneration presented Document “C”. Plans and photographs were displayed in respect of each application and representations summarised.
(a) 2 Tower Road, Saltaire, Shipley Shipley
Full planning application for construction of two dwellings on land at 2 Tower Road, Saltaire, Shipley – 16/03326/FUL
The Strategic Director, Regeneration gave a presentation setting out the proposals and tabled plans detailing the layout. He reported that the proposal was for the construction of two semi detached properties in a side garden of an existing house that was located on a reasonably wide sloping street. There was residential parking on the street and a row of terraced properties faced onto the garden. The site had a stone wall boundary and could be accessed via a back street between the terraced houses and the garden site. Members were informed that the proposal was to construct a pair of two storey houses with rooms in the roof space that would be 9.8 metres wide and comparable in height to the existing property. The dwellings would be set back from the road and have parking provision. The garage and parking would also be retained for 2 Tower Road. It was noted that a number of objections had been received, including two from Ward Councillors and the issues were outlined in the officer’s report. The Strategic Director, Regeneration confirmed that there would be 13 metres between Bingley Road and the proposed development and 21 metres between the new houses and Dallam House. He explained that the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) stated that applications should be considered on their own merits. The site was an infill gap and the proposal would increase the density in the street. There was an assortment of houses in the area and the character of the street scene would be maintained. It was noted that the site was located on a relatively busy route, however, it was acknowledged that parking would be provided for the new development and retained for the existing property. The Council’s Highways Department had not objected to the scheme and, therefore, the application was recommended for approval, subject to the conditions as set out in the report.
In response to a Member’s query, the Strategic Director, Regeneration confirmed that another application would have to be submitted if dormer windows were to be added.
A couple of objectors were present at the meeting and made the following statements:
· The pleasant view would be blocked by houses. · The kitchen and dining room of his property was located on the lower floor. · The rear of his property was used more than the front, as it was beside a busy main road. · Traffic was an issue in the area. · The proposal did not meet the requirements of the NPPF. · Safety y was an issue. · Tower Road was used as a ‘rat run’ at busy periods due to the traffic in Saltaire. · Bin collection days were problematic. · It was an awkward street for existing residents. · The proposal was out of character ... view the full minutes text for item 9. |
|
|
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS The Panel is asked to consider other matters which are set out in Document “D” relating to miscellaneous items:
(a) - (b) Decisions made by the Secretary of State – Allowed (c) – (d) Decisions made by the Secretary of State – Dismissed
(Mohammed Yousuf – 01274 434605)
Minutes:
The Panel noted the following:
DECISIONS MADE BY THE SECRETARY OF STATE
APPEALS ALLOWED
(a) Cemetery Lodge, Bailey Hills Road, Bingley Bingley
Demolition of existing mono pitched outbuilding and construction of new detached dwelling - Case No: 15/02149/FUL
Appeal Ref: 16/00009/APPFL2
(b) Hoyle Court, Otley Road, Charlestown, Baildon Baildon
Double-legged post-mounted sign - Case No: 16/00501/ADV
Appeal Ref: 16/00061/APPAD1
APPEALS DISMISSED
(c) 25 Staveley Way, Keighley Keighley West
Alterations to Planning Application No 11/00912/HOU to form a "Granny Annex" with a gable roof to the front elevation - Case No: 15/06896/HOU
Appeal Ref: 16/00064/APPHOU
(d) 44 Westgate, Shipley Shipley
Installation of roller shutter to secure property - Case No: 15/03397/FUL
Appeal Ref: 16/00052/APPFL2
Resolved –
That the decisions be noted.
Action: Strategic Director, Regeneration |
PDF 115 KB