Items
No. |
Item |
31. |
DISCLOSURES OF INTEREST
(Members Code of Conduct - Part 4A of the
Constitution)
To receive disclosures of interests from
members and co-opted members on matters to be considered at the
meeting. The disclosure must include
the nature of the interest.
An
interest must also be disclosed in the meeting when it becomes
apparent to the member during the meeting.
Notes:
(1) Members may remain
in the meeting and take part fully in discussion and voting unless
the interest is a disclosable pecuniary
interest or an interest which the Member feels would call into
question their compliance with the wider principles set out in the
Code of Conduct. Disclosable pecuniary interests relate to the
Member concerned or their spouse/partner.
(2) Members in arrears
of Council Tax by more than two months must not vote in decisions
on, or which might affect, budget calculations, and must disclose
at the meeting that this restriction applies to them. A failure to comply with these requirements is a
criminal offence under section 106 of the Local Government Finance
Act 1992.
(3) Members are also
welcome to disclose interests which are not disclosable pecuniary interests but which they
consider should be made in the interest of clarity.
(4) Officers must
disclose interests in accordance with Council Standing Order
44.
Minutes:
1. The
following declarations of interest were received In the interest of
transparency:
(i)
Councillor Dodds declared an interest in the item relating to Big
Local (Minute 39) as she was a member of the Big Local
Board.
(ii) Councillor
Sharp declared an interest in the item relating to
Community Building Grants (Minute 41) as she worked in
the voluntary sector.
2.
Councillor L Cromie declared a prejudicial interest in the item
relating
to Community Building Grants (Minute 41) as an organisation she was
a member of was in receipt of a
grant.
ACTION:
City Solicitor
|
|
32. |
MINUTES
Recommended –
That the
minutes of the meeting held on 22 September 2016 be signed as a
correct record (previously circulated).
(Yusuf
Patel – 01274 434579)
Minutes:
Resolved –
That the minutes of
the meeting held on 22 September 2016 be signed as a correct
record.
|
|
33. |
INSPECTION OF REPORTS AND BACKGROUND PAPERS
(Access to
Information Procedure Rules – Part 3B of the
Constitution)
Reports and background papers for agenda
items may be inspected by contacting the person shown after each
agenda item. Certain reports and
background papers may be restricted.
Any request to remove the restriction on a
report or background paper should be made to the relevant Strategic
Director or Assistant Director whose name is shown on the front
page of the report.
If that request is refused, there is a right
of appeal to this meeting.
Please contact the officer shown below in
advance of the meeting if you wish to appeal.
(Yusuf Patel - 01274 434579)
Minutes:
There were no appeals submitted by the public to
review decisions to restrict documents.
|
|
34. |
PUBLIC QUESTION TIME
(Access to Information
Procedure Rules – Part 3B of the Constitution)
To hear questions from electors
within the District on any matter this is the responsibility of the
Committee.
Questions must be received in writing by the City Solicitor in Room 112, City
Hall, Bradford, BD1 1HY, by mid-day on Tuesday 22 November
2016.
(Yusuf Patel - 01274 434579)
Minutes:
There were no
questions submitted by the public.
|
|
35. |
A641 HUDDERSFIELD ROAD/NETHERLANDS AVE JUNCTION IMPROVEMENT - TRO OBJECTIONS PDF 523 KB
The Strategic Director Regeneration will
submit a report (Document “R”) which
sets out objections to a recently advertised Traffic
Regulation Order for improvements to the junction of A641
Huddersfield Road/Netherlands Avenue.
Recommended
–
(1)
That the objections be overruled and the
Traffic Regulation Order for various mandatory and prohibited
movements at the A641 Huddersfield Road/Netherlands Aveune junction be sealed and implemented as
advertised and in conjunction with the layout modifications
detailed on Plan No. TDG/THS/103352/TRO-1A attached as Appendix
A.
(2)
That the objectors be informed
accordingly.
Overview and Scrutiny Committee –
Environment and Waste Management
(Andrew Smith - 01274 434674)
|
Minutes:
The Strategic Director
Regeneration submitted a report (Document R”)
which set out objections to a recently
advertised Traffic Regulation Order for improvements to the
junction of A641 Huddersfield Road/Netherlands Avenue.
The Principal Highways Engineer
explained that this junction had been identified as a site for
concern given the number of accidents recorded, and a casualty
reduction scheme was now being proposed, which had resulted in a
number of objections being received and these were detailed in the
report.
In relation to the proposed
measures, traffic signals had been considered but discounted on the
grounds of cost and wider impact to a more favoured option of rationalising traffic
manoeuvres and reducing the potential conflict for
drivers.
A Member stated that he had
concerns regarding the junction for a number of years, however
traffic lights would be too prohibitive for drivers as well as
costly and that the proposals offered the best solution at this
present time.
A resident of Larch Hill was
present and stated that she had lived in the area for many years
and during this time there had been a number of changes on what was
a very busy road. She highlighted that
the proposals would result in Larch Hill being used as a rat run by
drivers, which would have an adverse impact on the residents and
create congestion at the roundabout, as well as the potential for
more accidents.
In response the Highways
Engineer stated that although there was a potential for drivers to
access Larch Hill, he did not envisage there would be an increase
in the volume of traffic using Larch Hill.
A Ward Councillor for the area
was present at the meeting and stated that although he saw some
benefits in the proposal in reducing the volume of traffic one way,
there could be a corresponding increase in traffic using adjacent
roads like Larch Hill, so he sympathised with the concerns
expressed by the objectors. He added that there had been issues on
Netherlands Avenue for a number of years and the proposals only
offered a piecemeal solution to what required a more comprehensive
solution. He suggested that officers
carry out further traffic modelling to assess traffic movements
prior to the implementation of the scheme.
The Highways Engineer confirmed
that a traffic survey could be undertaken prior to the imposition
of the scheme and it was therefore:
Resolved –
(1)
That the objections be overruled and the
Traffic Regulation Order for various mandatory and prohibited
movements at the A641 Huddersfield Road/Netherlands Avenue junction
be sealed and implemented as advertised and in conjunction with the
layout modifications detailed on Plan No. TDG/THS/103352/TRO-1A
attached as Appendix A to Document “R”.
(2)
That a traffic survey be undertaken
prior to the implementation of the Huddersfield Road/Netherlands
Avenue junction improvement scheme following consultation with ward
councillors on the scope of the survey.
(3)
That the objectors be informed
accordingly.
ACTION: Strategic Director
Regeneration
Overview and Scrutiny Committee
– Environment and Waste Management
|
36. |
NETHERLANDS AVENUE, ROYDS/WIBSEY/WYKE - PETITION PDF 1 MB
The Strategic
Director Regeneration will submit a report (Document
“S”) which sets out a petition
requesting control measures to reduce the amount of vehicles
passing through Netherlands Avenue, deter vehicles abusing the
Access Only Order and reduce vehicle speeds and noise
levels.
Recommended
–
(1)
That no further action be taken on the
request for additional traffic measures on Netherlands
Avenue.
(2)
That the lead petitioner be informed
accordingly.
Overview
and Scrutiny Area: Environment and Waste Management
(Andrew Smith - 01274 434674)
|
Minutes:
The
Strategic Director Regeneration submitted a report (Document “S”) which set out a petition requesting control measures to reduce the amount of
vehicles passing through Netherlands Avenue, deter vehicles abusing
the Access Only Order and reduce vehicle speeds and noise
levels.
The Principal Highways Engineer
alluded to the historic traffic issues and Traffic Regulation
Orders affecting Netherlands Avenue and that although officers
acknowledged that there was a lot of through traffic, and that the
Access Only Order was regularly flouted, the average speed was in
the low thirties and therefore no scheme was being suggested at the
present time which would visibly reduce the issues being
experienced by residents, barring a traffic calming scheme or a
road closure, none of which had universal support in the
area.
The lead petitioner was present
a the meeting and stated that he was only made aware of the matter
being discussed by this Area Committee quite late in the day and he
had not had time to study the contents of the report. However in the 20 years he had lived on the area,
there had been a number of accidents, many which had not been
reported, so the figures relating to accidents were not
accurate. He also expressed concerns at
the speeding traffic and that this could result in a serious injury
or a fatality and therefore the issue of speeding traffic and
volumes of traffic on Netherlands Avenue had to be addressed, with
a traffic survey being undertaken to fully understand traffic
volume as well as improved enforcement by the Police, regarding
speed.
A former Ward Councillor was
present and expressed his support for the petition and suggested
that the funding should be found for traffic lights at the
junctions and a method for controlling speed, particularly in the
vicinity of the primary school.
In response the Highways
Engineer acknowledged that not all collisions were reported to the
Police, however a speed survey had been undertaken, which had not
raised a concern about speeding traffic and that any speed
enforcement was an issue for the Police, however where there were
speeding concerns, the Council did flag these up with the Police
through partnership meetings.
A Ward Councillor was also
present and stated that many of the issues raised were historical,
however the report had failed to identify and address some of the
key issues affecting Netherlands Avenue. He expressed concerns that ward councillors in the
area had not been fully consulted on the issues and although he
appreciated that options had been looked at many years ago, that
officers should now look at the issue afresh, including
clarification of the traffic survey data, traffic speeds and
consulting with ward councillors and residents on possible
options.
Members agreed with the above
suggestions and it was therefore:
Resolved –
(1)
That consideration of the petition be
deferred to allow for further consultation to be undertaken with
ward councillors and residents with a view to looking at all the
options and clarification ...
view the full minutes text for item 36.
|
37. |
SOUTH BRADFORD FREIGHT PARKING ISSUES PDF 145 KB
The Strategic Director Regeneration will
submit a report (Document “Z”) which
identifies the requirement for an outside sourced
study using industry and academic expertise to properly understand
the issues and identify a preferred parking facility option to
tackle the problem in recognition of the well established issues
relating to freight parking in South Bradford
Recommended –
That
Bradford South Area Committee notes this report.
Overview and Scrutiny Committee: Environment
and Waste Management
Tom Jones, Assistant
Transport Planner
|
(Tom Jones – 01274 434983)
Minutes:
The Strategic Director
Regeneration submitted a report (Document
“Z”) which identified the
requirement for an outside sourced study using industry and
academic expertise to properly understand the issues and identify a
preferred parking facility option to tackle the problem in
recognition of the well established issues relating to freight
parking in South Bradford.
The Transport Planning
Officer explained that in the context of the freight parking issues
affecting different locations in Bradford South, that the proposed
study would provide some clarity and suggest a way
forward.
A Member in welcoming
the approach, highlighted the issue with freight parking and its
impact in the Bradford South area and that a lorry park would
alleviate many of the concerns that had been expressed over the
years.
The Transport Planning
Officer acknowledged that it was important to come up with a
comprehensive solution rather than offering something that was
piecemeal and therefore the study would focus on all the key
issues, including a secure location, which provided good
facilities.
Resolved –
(1) That the report be
noted and the proposal to undertaken a study to
fully understand the issues and identify a preferred parking
facility option to tackle the problem be supported.
(2)
That a further report be presented to the Area Committee in 12
months time.
ACTION: Strategic Director Regeneration
Overview and Scrutiny
Committee: Environment and Waste Management
|
|
38. |
ROOK LANE - PETITION PDF 856 KB
The Strategic Director Regeneration
will submit a report (Document “T”)
which sets out a petition from residents of Rook
Lane requesting:
i.
Prohibiting access to the area for heavy goods
vehicles of 7.5 tonne and above from the A650 Tong Street access
point
ii.
Prohibiting access to all industrial and commercial
premises off the A6177 Ring Road.
iii.
A prohibition of overnight heavy goods vehicle
parking (except permitted areas for 1 hour maximum).
iv.
Permit parking for the
residents and no waiting at any time restrictions to maintain
access for all through traffic.
Recommended
–
(1)
That no further action be taken on the
request for various parking and HGV movement restrictions on Rook
Lane.
(2)
That the petitioners be informed
accordingly.
Overview and Scrutiny Committee: Environment and Waste
Management
(Andrew Smith - 01274 434674)
|
Minutes:
The Strategic Director
Regeneration submitted a report (Document
“T”) which set out a petition
from residents of Rook Lane requesting:
i.
Prohibiting access to the area for heavy goods
vehicles of 7.5 tonne and above from the A650 Tong Street access
point
ii.
Prohibiting access to all industrial and commercial
premises off the A6177 Ring Road.
iii.
A prohibition of overnight heavy goods vehicle
parking (except permitted areas for 1 hour maximum).
Permit parking for the residents and no waiting at any time
restrictions to maintain access for all through traffic.
The
Principal Highways Engineer stated that Rook Lane was a wide road
that connected the A650 to the A6177 and he suggested that the road
could be looked at as part of the freight parking study.
Members in acknowledging the problems experienced by the
residents of Rook Lane ascertained the options that could be
explored The Principal Highways
Engineer explained that a number of measures could be looked,
including introducing a no waiting restriction, however it would
better to await the outcomes of the freight study.
The
lead petitioner was present at the meeting and explained that the
issue had to be addressed head on and not pushed away. He stated that the proposed lorry park would not
help resolve the issues on Rook Lane, as many firms already had
parking facilities, but drivers insisted on parking on the road,
causing unnecessary problems for residents. He stressed that
lorries turning up in the early hours of the morning or late at
night, revving their engines and having their refrigeration units
on were a particularly issue, resulting in him and other residents
losing sleep. He added that he had
approached the firm in question to express his concerns but they
had failed to resolve the issues. In addition he had also contacted the
firms headquarters in Manchester who had expressed a willingness to
assist. The lead petitioner circulated
photographs showing the extent of the problems along with
correspondences.
During the discussion Members empathised with the concerns
raised by the lead petitioner and suggested that a survey could be
undertaken as a way forward to get an idea of the extent of the
problem and it was therefore:
Resolved
–
(1)
That an independent traffic survey be
commissioned in order to fully understand the extent of HGV parking
on Rook Lane.
(2)
That the petitioners be informed
accordingly.
ACTION: Strategic Director
Regeneration
Overview and Scrutiny Committee: Environment and Waste
Management
|
|
39. |
BIG LOCAL - SCHOLEMOOR AND LIDGET GREEN PDF 514 KB
The Strategic Director
Environment and Sport will submit a report (Document
“U”) which informs the Area
Committee on progress to develop the GreenMoor Big Local Programme.
Recommended
–
(1)
That the Bradford South Area Committee welcomes the report and
thanks all
those involved in the Greenmoor Big
Local project on the progress
made.
(2)
That a further report is presented to the Area Committee in 12
months 1time.
Overview and Scrutiny
Committee: Corporate
(Mick Charlton - 01274 431155)
|
Minutes:
The Strategic Director
Environment and Sport submitted a report (Document
“U”) which informed the Area Committee on progress to develop the
GreenMoor Big Local
Programme.
Representatives from
the Big Local Board were present at the meeting and highlighted a
number of projects that had been funded by the Board, including the
Spencer Fields lighting project and the Well Being Café in
Scholemoor and also alluded to a number
of projects that were in their infancy.
It was stressed that the aim was to try and get the most value for
money from the projects that were funded, with a view to securing
match funding, and that all projects were thoroughly scrutinised by
the board prior to the release of any monies.
Members welcomed the
progress made by the Big Local Programme since its inception, and
that the projects that had been funded so far, and commended the
work of the board and ward councillors for their input.
Resolved –
(1)
That the Bradford South Area Committee welcomes the report
and thanks all those involved in the
Greenmoor Big Local project
on the progress made.
(2)
That a further report be presented to the Area Committee in 12
months time.
ACTION: Bradford South Area
Coordinator
Overview and Scrutiny
Committee: Corporate
|
|
40. |
COMMUNITY MANAGED LIBRARIES IN BRADFORD SOUTH PDF 131 KB
The Strategic Director Environment
and Sport will submit a report (Document
“V”) which gives an update on
progress on moving three libraries in Bradford South, which include
Great Horton, Holme Wood and Queensbury
from direct Council staff management to Community Managed
Libraries.
Recommended
–
That
Bradford South Area Committee note, and consider the content of
this report.
Overview and Scrutiny Committee: Regeneration
and Economy
(Phil Barker - 01274 432616)
|
Minutes:
The Strategic Director
Environment and Sport submitted a report (Document
“V”) which gave an update on
progress on moving three libraries in Bradford South, which
included Great Horton, Holme Wood and
Queensbury from direct Council staff management to Community
Managed Libraries.
The Assistant Director
Sport and Leisure acknowledged that in moving to community managed
libraries a number of issues had been encountered around IT and
data protection, which were in the process of being
resolved. In addition the number of
volunteers coming forward had been slow and efforts were on going
to try and address this. It was also
mentioned that the Executive had recently received a petition
requesting that Holme Wood Library
continues to operate under the old structure. The Assistant
Director stressed that although the intention was to move to a
community managed library model, all libraries would still be part
of the Bradford Libraries network.
The Chair stated that
in relation to the Holme Wood Library,
although progress had been slow in moving to a community managed
library model, there had now been some traction in the last few
weeks and it was important to keep the
momentum going in order to meet the April 2017 deadline.
In relation to a
question on the progress of the Great Horton library to move to a
community managed library, it was explained that there were
ongoing discussions with St Johns
Church with a view to undertaking a community asset transfer in due
course, however a number of issues still had to be
resolved.
Resolved –
That the report be noted and that officers be thanked
for providing detailed responses to Members’
questions.
ACTION:
No Action
Overview and Scrutiny
Committee: Regeneration and Economy
|
|
41. |
THE ALLOCATION OF THE COMMUNITY BUILDING GRANTS (EXTENDED COMMUNITY CENTRE CORE COSTS) PDF 169 KB
The Strategic Director Environment
and Sport will submit a report (Document
“W”) which sets out the Community
Building Grants allocation process.
Community Building Grants are for Voluntary and Community Sector
organisations to support them in meeting their associated building
related costs.
|
Recommended
–
(1)
Bradford South Area Committee notes the
proposed allocation
process for Community Building Grants.
(2)
Bradford South Area Coordinator is
requested to organise meetings of
the Area Committee’s Grant Advisory Group to
consider Community Building Grant applications for funding from
groups within the Bradford South
Area.
(3) Bradford
South Area Coordinator will bring a
further report to a meeting within the 2016-17 municipal year with
recommendations from the Grant Advisory Group on how to allocate
the Community Building Grants funds available.
Overview and Scrutiny Committee: Corporate
(Amria Khatun – 01274 437467)
|
Minutes:
The Strategic Director
Environment and Sport submitted a report (Document
“W”) which set out the
Community Building Grants allocation process. Community Building Grants were for Voluntary and
Community Sector organisations to support them in meeting their
associated building related costs.
The Bradford South
Area Coordinator explained the process and the options open to
organisations affected and what help would be available to meet
their costs, including community organisations moving to charitable
status and obtaining relief on their business rates. He added that all the organisations affected had
been informed and invited to a consultation event.
|
Resolved –
(1)
That the proposed allocation process for Community Building
Grants be noted.
(2)
That the Bradford South Area
Coordinator be requested to organise
meetings of the Area Committee’s Grant Advisory Group
to
consider Community Building Grant applications for funding
from groups within the Bradford
South Area.
(4)
That in the event of a conflict of interest relating to the
Community
Building Grants Application process, Councillor
Dodds replaces Councillor L Cromie as a member of the Grants
Advisory Group for the purposes of this process.
(3) That the Bradford
South Area Coordinator brings a further
report to a meeting within the 2016-17 municipal year with
recommendations from the Grant Advisory Group on how to allocate
the Community Building Grants funds available.
ACTION: Bradford South Area
Coordinator
Overview and Scrutiny
Committee: Corporate
|
42. |
PROGRESS REPORT ON BRADFORD'S FAMILIES FIRST PROJECT PHASE 2 - OF THE NATIONAL TROUBLED FAMILIES PROGRAMME PDF 252 KB
The Assistant Director
Children’s Social Care will submit a report (Document
“X”) outlines the multi agency
work to deliver the Bradford’s District wide
Families
First Programme which forms part of the National Troubled
Families
Programme.
Recommended –
(1)
That the South Area Committee notes this report.
(2)
That the South Area Committee notes the need for a continued
assertive and intensive approach to reach, engage and improve
o outcomes for the
agreed number of families. A whole system approach
will be required to reach and engage these families lead
by the
Targeted Early Help Service, other key Council teams and
wider partners and
commissioned services.
Overview
and Scrutiny Committee: Children’s Services
(Martyn Stenton - 01274 432558)
|
Minutes:
The
Assistant Director Children’s Social Care submitted a
report
(Document “X”) which outlined the multi agency work to deliver the
Bradford’s District wide Families First Programme which
forms part of
the
National Troubled Families Programme.
Representatives from the Families First Programme were present
at the
meeting
and gave an overview of the programme, highlighting the success
of
the
programme and the activities being undertaken in Phase
2. To date 1416
families
had been reached and payment by results claims had been made
for
214 of
these families. In addition in Phase 2
the intention was to deliver
interventions to 5,990 families by March 2020 against locally
agreed payment
by results
targets.
During the
discussion a Members commended the families first
programme
and how it
changed the lives of the families who had engaged with
the
programme.
In
response to a question regarding referrals, it was pointed out that
although
a referral could be made or
individuals could self refer, consent of the
individual
being referred was crucial and without this, no engagement
work
would take
place with the family.
In
response to a question regarding engagement, it was explained that
where
families
are hesitant to engage, other routes/relationships would be
explored
to try and
engage with the family.
Resolved–
(1)
That the report be noted.
(2)
That the need for a continued assertive and intensive approach to
reach,
engage and improve outcomes for the agreed number of
families be noted. A whole system approach will be required to
reach
and engage these families lead by the Targeted Early Help
Service, other key Council teams and wider partners and
commissioned services.
ACTION: Assistant
Director Children’s Social Care
Overview and Scrutiny Committee: Children’s
Services
|
|
43. |
WARM HOMES HEALTHY PEOPLE PROGRAMME (WHHP) PDF 322 KB
The Director of Public Health will
submit a report (Document “Y”)
which
seeks to
raise awareness of the Warm Homes Health People programme which
offers short term interventions during the winter months to support
vulnerable households in the District and explore methods to
sustain the programme beyond Public health funding.
Recommended –
That option
2 as set out in Document “Y” be adopted and that the
area committee and their support officers engage with Warm Homes
Healthy People by raising awareness and positively identifying
vulnerable households and encouraging referrals through to the
programme.
Overview and Scrutiny Committee: Health and Social
Care
(Sarah Possingham/Pam Bhupal – 01274 431319)
|
Minutes:
The Director of Public
Health submitted a report (Document
“Y”) which sought
to raise awareness of the Warm Homes Health People programme which
offered short term interventions during the winter months to
support vulnerable households in the district and explored methods
to sustain the programme beyond Public health funding.
It was
explained that the programme was Bradford’s response to cold
weather and assisting the vulnerable though a number of initiatives
around active communities; connecting people; keeping warm and
healthy heating.
In the
current programme 9 organisations had been grant aided to deliver
interventions including Age UK and innchurches.
In response
to a question regarding referrals it was pointed out that there was
no emergency referral system, however any referrals were assessed
on a triage basis, in order to assess the level of need and
help. In addition people could also
self refer and the help being offered would be publicised
widely.
Resolved –
That option
2 as set out in Document “Y” be adopted and that the
Area Committee and their support officers engage with Warm Homes
Healthy People by raising awareness and positively identifying
vulnerable households and encouraging referrals through to the
programme.
ACTION: Director of Public
Health
Overview and Scrutiny Committee: Health and Social
Care
|
|
44. |
BRADFORD SOUTH WARD PLANS UPDATE PDF 500 KB
The Bradford South Area Coordinator will
submit a report (Document “AA”) which
outlines the work of the Bradford South Area
Co-ordinator’s Office in the period 1 April to 30 September
2016 to support Ward priorities within the Bradford
South.
Recommended
–
That the
work of the Bradford South Area Co-ordinator’s Office in the
period 1 April to 30 September 2016 to support Ward priorities
within the Bradford South Area Committee Action Plan 2014-17 be
noted.
Overview and Scrutiny Committee: Corporate
(Mick Charlton – 01274 431155)
|
Minutes:
The Bradford South
Area Coordinator submitted a report (Document
“AA”) which outlined the work of the
Bradford South Area Co-ordinator’s Office in the period 1
April to 30 September 2016 to support Ward priorities within the
Bradford South.
The Chair and Members
of the Committee extended their thanks to the ward officers and the
support team for the work they had undertaken.
Resolved –
That
the work of the Bradford South Area
Co-ordinator’s Office in the period 1 April to 30 September
2016 to support Ward priorities within the Bradford South Area
Committee Action Plan 2014-17 be noted.
ACTION: NO ACTION
Overview and Scrutiny Committee: Corporate
|
|
45. |
2016/17 BRADFORD SOUTH YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CHEST GRANTS PDF 194 KB
The Strategic Director Environment
and Sport will submit a report (Document
“AB”) which details the Youth and
Community Chest Grants awarded from applications received prior to
the 31August 2016 deadline.
Recommended –
(1)
That the wide range of applications from groups, organisations
and individuals across Bradford South are noted and
welcomed.
(2)
That the Bradford South Area Co-ordinator’s Office continue
to
ensure the effective allocation of the Youth and Community Chest
budget
by providing appropriate advice and support to
applicants.
Overview and Scrutiny
Committee: Corporate
(Mick Charlton – 01274 431155)
|
Minutes:
The Strategic Director
Environment and Sport submitted a report (Document
“AB”) which detailed the
Youth and Community Chest Grants awarded from applications received
prior to the 31August 2016 deadline.
Resolved–
(1)
That the wide range of applications from groups, organisations and
individuals across Bradford South be noted and welcomed.
(2)
That the Bradford South Area Co-ordinator’s Office continue
to
ensure the effective allocation of the Youth and Community Chest
budget
by providing appropriate advice and support to
applicants.
ACTION: Bradford South Area Coordinator
Overview and Scrutiny
Committee: Corporate
(Mick Charlton – 01274 431155)
|
|