Local democracy

Issue - meetings

ANNUAL UPDATE ON ROAD SAFETY EDUCATION, TRAINING AND PUBLICITY IN THE BRADFORD DISTRICT

Meeting: 14/10/2021 - Keighley Area Committee (Item 15)

15 ANNUAL UPDATE ON ROAD SAFETY EDUCATION, TRAINING AND PUBLICITY IN THE BRADFORD DISTRICT pdf icon PDF 203 KB

The Strategic Director, Place, will present a report, (Document “C”) which provides an update on current casualty levels and trends in the Bradford District and on the Road Safety Education, Training and Publicity initiatives aimed at reducing those casualties.

 

Recommended –

 

That an evidence based approach to determining Road Safety priorities continues to be supported.

 

(Becky James – 01274 437409/ 07929 747447)

Decision:

Resolved –

 

1.    That the evidence based approach to determining Road Safety priorities continues to be supported.

 

2.    That the Strategic Director, Place, be requested to include in the next annual report to the Committee, details of schools not engaging in the Road Safety Education and Training initiatives and plans to attract those schools which are historically disengaged.

 

3.    That the Strategic Director, Place, be requested to provide the most current data, on an individual ward basis, for road casualties in the Keighley constituency.

 

ACTION: Strategic Director Place

 

Minutes:

The Strategic Director, Place, presented a report, (Document “C”) which updated Members on current casualty levels and trends in the Bradford District and on the Road Safety, Education, Training and Publicity initiatives aimed at reducing those casualties. 

 

A Member questioned developments in the School Streets project and it was reported that this was led by traffic engineers.  Colleagues in the Road Safety team were involved in supporting the pilot schemes and attended sites to observe behaviours.  Schools had been chosen to partake in the scheme where it was felt it would be appropriate in their areas.  Temporary Traffic Regulation Orders (TRO) were in place at those locations as the initiative was only a pilot at this stage. 

 

A Member questioned if the cycle training referred to in the report was similar to the Cycling Proficiency Scheme and it was confirmed that this was similar to the older scheme.  There were three core levels of training provided. The first level was conducted in an off road environment and developed basic cycle skills.  The second level focused on road skills and was conducted in quiet locations.  The third level was more advanced including multi-lane carriageway and roundabout training.  It was also reported that there were other modules funded by the Department of Transport which focused on helping children learn to ride or family training.  A Member referred to a scheme which donated cycles to children and suggested that links be made with that organisation called ‘ONNA Bike’.  In response it was explained that the service had a small fleet of cycles which could be loaned to children and it was agreed to contact ‘ONNA Bike’.

 

The report referred to the three tier district wide service engaging with schools.  The first tier was where schools in the eight wards with the highest child casualties were targeted.  The second tier was the delivery of presentations by the team which were booked on a first come first served basis.  The third tier was the provision of resources and information for all schools which did not need a road safety officer to deliver.    The action taken to encourage those schools which had not previously engaged with the service was questioned and it was acknowledged colleagues were aware of schools where they had struggled to engage and that there was work to be undertaken to get the message through to schools which did not see the education and training as a priority.  It was agreed that future annual reports would include details of the initiatives to be developed.  

 

The accident and casualty data contained in Document “C” was questioned and it was explained that the figures revealed more casualties than accidents as often one accident resulted in more than one casualty.

 

The level of training for adult cyclists and motor cyclists was questioned.  The benefit of parental engagement and education was also raised as a possible area for development.   In response the Strategic Director explained that although the trend for casualty figures had reduced the accident rate  ...  view the full minutes text for item 15